Defending Ohio’s prohibition on the use or carrying of firearms by intoxicated persons.
Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Issue At Stake: Prohibited persons
Summary: Columbus, Ohio, represented by Everytown Law, filed an amicus brief in the Ohio Supreme Court defending the states prohibition on intoxicated people carrying or using firearms. The brief was joined by Cincinnati, Akron, Dayton, Lima and Toledo. The case is significant because the Ohio Supreme Court could change the way it treats challenges to gun laws under its state constitution. This could not only put laws currently on the books in Ohio at risk of being struck down, but also block future GVP legislation from going into effect. The Cities’ amicus brief argued that in this case there is no need to set a standard for how to review gun cases because the carrying and use of firearms by the currently intoxicated is not conduct that is protected by the right to bear arms as historically understood. The brief discussed the long history of state laws regulating the combination of guns and alcohol going back to Virginia in 1655 and continuing to the present day with widespread laws about carrying while intoxicated and prohibiting guns in bars and other places alcohol is served.
In December 2020, the Ohio Supreme Court, citing the Cities’ brief, ruled to uphold the state prohibition on carrying a gun while intoxicated.
The information contained in the Everytown Law webpage is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipient of content from this site, client or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. The content of this website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The transmission of information through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between Everytown and any recipient or sender.
Did you know?
30 percent of guns recovered by ATF in California have no serial number on them, making it impossible for law enforcement to trace.