HONOLULU, HI – Everytown for Gun Safety filed this amicus brief in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii in a case challenging under the Second Amendment a Hawaii law prohibiting the civilian possession of electric arms such as tasers and stun guns. Everytown’s brief makes two doctrinal points in response to arguments advanced by plaintiff. First, Everytown demonstrates the circularity and illogic of the “common use” test argued for by plaintiff, based on sales data, which cannot be reconciled with the Supreme Court’s decision in Heller, binding court of appeals precedent, or common sense, and which, if accepted, would threaten public safety. Second, the brief explains why the “strict scrutiny” standard argued for by plaintiff is not the correct Second Amendment standard—and why, applying it here, would be inconsistent with more than a century’s worth of history of laws prohibiting other weapons less deadly than firearms.
The information contained in the Everytown Law webpage is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipient of content from this site, client or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. The content of this website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The transmission of information through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between Everytown and any recipient or sender.
Did you know?
30 percent of guns recovered by ATF in California have no serial number on them, making it impossible for law enforcement to trace.