United States v. Price
12.22.22
You will be redirected momentarily.
12.22.22
Defending the federal prohibition on possessing firearms with obliterated serial numbers.
Court: Fourth Circuit
Issue at Stake: Safety features
Summary: United States v. Price is a Second Amendment challenge to the federal law that prohibits possessing a firearm with an obliterated serial number. The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia granted Price’s motion to dismiss the part of his indictment charging him with violating that prohibition.
Everytown for Gun Safety filed an amicus brief in the Fourth Circuit, urging the court to reverse the district court’s judgment. The brief explains that the plaintiffs have failed to establish that possessing an unserialized gun is protected under the Second Amendment, and offers insight into three methodological issues should the court address the historical step of the New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen analysis. First, Everytown argues that the court should center its historical analysis on 1868 as opposed to 1791, and should also consider earlier and later laws. Second, the brief urges the court against dismissing the state’s historical analogues as outliers, because even a small number of laws can be sufficient to establish a tradition of firearm regulation under Bruen. Finally, the brief suggests that the court should approach history with nuance—conditions warranting the regulation of firearms with obliterated serial numbers did not exist until the 20th century, and thus the absence of similar regulations in earlier periods provides no evidence that they were thought to be unconstitutional.
The information contained in the Everytown Law webpage is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipient of content from this site, client or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. The content of this website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The transmission of information through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between Everytown Law and any recipient or sender.
Did you know?
30 percent of guns recovered by ATF in California have no serial number on them, making it impossible for law enforcement to trace.
Stephens A. “Ghost Guns Are Everywhere in California”. The Trace. (2019). https://bit.ly/2DKkIlt
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |