Antonyuk v. Nigrelli (Antonyuk II)
01.17.23
You will be redirected momentarily.
01.17.23
Defending New York’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act.
Courts: Northern District of New York; Second Circuit
Issues at Stake: Public carry; Licensing; Sensitive places
Summary: Antonyuk II is a second challenge, following Antonyuk I, to New York’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act (“CCIA”). The CCIA strengthens New York’s permitting requirements in the wake of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen and identifies sensitive places where firearms are prohibited.
On October 19, 2022, Everytown filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York in defense of the CCIA. The brief raises three main points in arguing why the regulations are constitutional under the approach to Second Amendment cases set out in Bruen. First, it explains that plaintiffs have not met their burden to establish that the Second Amendment’s plain text covers their proposed conduct. Second, the brief argues that the court should center its historical analysis on 1868 as opposed to 1791, and should also consider later laws. Third, it explains how even a small number of laws can be sufficient to establish a tradition of firearm regulation under Bruen.
The district court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction on November 7, 2022, and New York appealed. Everytown subsequently filed an amicus brief in the Second Circuit. In addition to expanding upon the three points raised in the district court, the brief also explains why the Second Circuit should consider context when evaluating the historical record.
The information contained in the Everytown Law webpage is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipient of content from this site, client or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. The content of this website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The transmission of information through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between Everytown Law and any recipient or sender.
Did you know?
30 percent of guns recovered by ATF in California have no serial number on them, making it impossible for law enforcement to trace.
Stephens A. “Ghost Guns Are Everywhere in California”. The Trace. (2019). https://bit.ly/2DKkIlt
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |