Christian v. Nigrelli
01.30.23
You will be redirected momentarily.
01.30.23
Defending New York’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act.
Courts: Western District of New York; Second Circuit
Issue at Stake: Sensitive places
Summary: Christian v. Nigrelli is a challenge to certain provisions in New York’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act. Among other things, plaintiffs challenge carrying restrictions in parks, public transit, and on the private property of others.
On November 12, 2022, Everytown filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York in defense of New York’s law. The brief argues that the regulations are constitutional under the approach to Second Amendment cases set out in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen. First, it explains that plaintiffs have not met their burden to establish that the Second Amendment’s plain text covers their proposed conduct. Second, it argues that the court should center its historical analysis on 1868 as opposed to 1791, and should also consider later laws. Third, the brief urges the court against dismissing the state’s historical analogues as outliers, because even a small number of laws can be sufficient to establish a tradition of firearm regulation under Bruen. Finally, the brief shows how the plaintiff’s arguments about historical restrictions are mistaken.
The district court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction on November 22, 2022, and New York appealed. Everytown subsequently submitted an amicus brief in the Second Circuit, expanding upon the points above to urge the Second Circuit to reverse the district court’s decision.
The information contained in the Everytown Law webpage is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipient of content from this site, client or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. The content of this website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The transmission of information through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between Everytown Law and any recipient or sender.
Did you know?
30 percent of guns recovered by ATF in California have no serial number on them, making it impossible for law enforcement to trace.
Stephens A. “Ghost Guns Are Everywhere in California”. The Trace. (2019). https://bit.ly/2DKkIlt
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |