Maryland Shall Issue v. County of Montgomery, Maryland
09.26.23
You will be redirected momentarily.
09.26.23
Defending Montgomery County’s prohibition on carrying firearms in places of “public assembly.”
Court: District of Maryland; Fourth Circuit
Issue at Stake: Sensitive places
Summary: Maryland Shall Issue v. Montgomery County is a case challenging a Montgomery County law that prohibits firearms at places of “public assembly,” which includes—among other locations—parks, places of worship, schools, and libraries. Plaintiffs allege that the regulations infringe upon their Second Amendment rights.
Everytown for Gun Safety filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, arguing that Montgomery County’s restrictions are constitutional under the approach to Second Amendment cases set out in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen. First, the brief explains that the plaintiffs failed to establish, as required under Bruen’s textual inquiry, that the Second Amendment’s plain text covers their proposed conduct. Second, it explains that the court should center its historical analysis on 1868 as opposed to 1791, and should also consider later laws. Third, the brief urges the court against dismissing the county’s historical analogues as outliers, because even a small number of laws can be sufficient to establish a tradition of firearm regulation under Bruen.
Decision: On July 6, 2023, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, concluding that they had failed to establish standing with respect to some locations and, as to the remainder, they were unlikely to succeed on the merits of their Second Amendment claims.
The information contained in the Everytown Law webpage is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipient of content from this site, client or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. The content of this website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The transmission of information through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between Everytown Law and any recipient or sender.
Did you know?
30 percent of guns recovered by ATF in California have no serial number on them, making it impossible for law enforcement to trace.
Stephens A. “Ghost Guns Are Everywhere in California”. The Trace. (2019). https://bit.ly/2DKkIlt
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |